![]()
Top of Part 4
![]()
Last page
![]()
Next page
|
4-4: The Wave Nature of Electrons |
As learned
in Part 1 and 2,
it has been made clear
that,
if a substance
is divided into
finer and finer pieces,
we reach molecules
and atoms,
and then we realize
that the atoms consist of
electrons and nuclei.
Namely, it has been
clarified that
matter is a collection
of ultramicroscopic
particles.
In the classical physics
up to the 19th century,
these particles were
considered to move
obeying Newtonian mechanics
and Maxwellian electromagnetism.
However, this viewpoint
has become doubtful
after the proposal of
the Bohr model
of the atomic structure
(Bohr's quantum theory).
On the other hand,
light
had been considered
to be electromagnetic waves
in the classical physics.
However, after
the discovery
of light quanta (photons),
it was clarified
that the light has
wave nature at one time
and
particle nature
at another time.
Namely, light has
a kind of duality.
Thinking of this,
L. V. de Broglie
(France, 1892 - 1987)
guessed that such substance
particles as electrons or
protons might have
wave nature, although
they had been considered
to have particle nature
so far.
|
[De Broglie Waves]
The idea of
de Broglie waves
or
de Broglie matter waves
is that,
thinking of the fact
that light which had been
considered to be
waves had the particle nature,
such a substance particle
as electron or proton
which had been considered
to be "particle"
might have "wave nature".
Hence, de Broglie
thought that,
if the double aspect,
i.e.
the duality
of the wave nature
and the particle nature,
is valid not only
for light but also
for such substance
particles as electrons,
Einstein's relations
which connect the particle
and wave aspects
in light quanta
would be satisfied
for de Broglie matter
waves as well.
Therefore the relations,
Eq. (1),
are often called
Einstein - de Broglie's relations.
If we apply these relations
to the case of the Bohr model
of the hydrogen atom,
we can well understand
its plausibility
as follows.
If we consider
that the electron
in a hydrogen atom
moves at constant speed
along a circular orbit
around the nucleus
(proton), the
quantum condition
in Bohr's quantum theory
is written as
Eq. (3) on the preceding page.
By using Einstein's relation
in this equation,
the quantum condition
is written
This equation means
that the circumference
of the circular orbit
of the electron
must be a integral multiple
of the wavelength of
de Broglie wave.
In other word,
de Broglie wave
accompanying the motion
of the electron
should be
continuous.
Therefore, we can easily
understand the quantum condition
that determines
the stationary states
by considering the continuity
of de Broglie waves.
(See the following figure.)
|
|
Bohr's quantum condition.
The condition for stationary states
The circumference of
the circular orbit
of the electron
should be an integral multiple
of the wavelength
of de Broglie wave,
otherwise the wave
cannot be smoothly continuous.
|
[The Laue Diagram
-- Wave Nature of X-Rays]
In 1914,
M. T. F. von Laue
(Germany, 1879 - 1960)
found a symmetrical pattern
of spots
on a photographic plate
by a beam of X-rays
that had passed
through a crystal.
This is called the
Laue diagram,
which is produced
by interference
of beams of X-rays diffracted
on the different atomic planes
in the crystal.
It was confirmed
by this phenomena that
X-rays are electromagnetic
waves of very short wavelengths.
The reason why
the interference pattern
in the Laue diagram
appears is as follows:
As shown in the above
figure,
an X-ray beam
is irradiated on a crystal
consisting of the atomic
planes A, B, ...
As light reflects
on a mirror,
so the X-ray beam striking
the plane A
with
the incident angle
reflects most strongly
in the same angle
.
The similar happens
on the plane B.
These X-ray beams reflected
on the planes A and B
interfere with each other and
constructive interference
takes place when
the difference in pathlength
is equal to an integral
number of wavelength
,
i.e.,
where d is
the interplanar distance,
and
is the angle
between
the incident X-ray
and the crystal plane.
This is called
Bragg's condition.
Thus a bright spot
will appear
in the angle satisfying
the condition.
When the white X-rays
which contain all wavelengths
are illuminated on a crystal,
various atomic planes
in the crystal
reflect the X-rays satisfying
Bragg's condition
selectively or exclusively,
and then
a symmetric pattern
of spots is produced
on the photographic plate
placed behind.
This is the Laue diagram,
an example of which
is shown in the following
picture.
|
|
An example of the Laue diagram
This is a interference
pattern of X-rays
diffracted by
a single crystal of silicon.
The small black spots
lined crosswise
are the so-called Laue spots.
Here, the wavelength
and the interatomic distance
are about
(Courtesy of Prof. Y. Soejima,
Dept. of Physics,
Kyushu Univ.)
|
[The Empirical Evidences
of the Wave Nature of Electrons]
The wavelength of
de Broglie wave
associated with the electrons
accelerated by
an electric potential
of 100 V
is about
( ).
This is almost
the same as that
of ordinary X-rays.
It is therefore supposed
that, if we bombarded
this electron beam
on a crystal,
we would observe
a diffraction pattern
similar to
the Laue diagram
in the case of X-rays.
In 1927,
American physicists,
C. J. Davisson
(USA, 1881 - 1958) and
L. H. Germer
(USA, 1896 - 1971)
observed an interference
pattern of
electron beams
diffracted by a single
crystal of nickel
for the first time
and, in the same year,
G. P. Thomson
(UK, 1892 - 1975)
independently observed
the diffraction pattern
using a metallic multi-crystal.
Next year,
S. Kikuchi
(Japan, 1902 - 74)
was also successful
in a similar experiment
using a thin film of mica.
An example of the diffraction
and interference
phenomena of electrons
is shown in the following
picture.
|
|
A diffraction pattern of electron beams
Electron beams
are diffracted
by a crystal
of manganese-nickel alloy.
In this case, the de Broglie wavelength
is shorter than
![]()
which corresponds
to rather high speed
electron beam.
(Courtesy of Prof. Y. Soejima,
Dept. of Physics,
Kyushu Univ.)
|
Looking at these results,
people could no longer
deny that
electrons possess
the double nature
(dual property),
i.e. the particle nature
and the wave nature.
|
Top
|
|
Go back to
the top page of Part 3.
Go back to
the last page.
Go to
the next page.
|