![]()
Top of Part 3
![]()
Last page
![]()
Next page
|
3-6: The Hypothesis of Light Quanta
and the Photoelectric Effect
|
[Einstein's Hypothesis
of Light Quanta]
As learned
on the preceding page,
it was clarified that
the energy of the radiation
(light) in a cavity
is integral multiples
of the elementary
unit
.
This can never
be explained with
the classical theory
which consist of
Newtonian mechanics
and Maxwellian
electromagnetism.
The reason is as follows.
A cavity
in a thermal equilibrium
is exchanging energies
with the surrounding
wall every moment.
In exchanging energies,
the amounts of energies
being given
and taken
are equal in average,
and they are balanced.
However, they are
always fluctuating
from moment to moment.
Strictly speaking,
the energies being
given and taken
are not necessarily equal,
but always fluctuating.
Accordingly,
the total energy
of the cavity radiation
is always fluctuating.
The energy of the cavity
radiation must
be a collection of
the elementary quanta
.
The energy fluctuation
must therefore be
an integral multiple
of the unit
.
Hence a finite amount
of energy
is coming in
or going out
of the cavity.
Such a finite amount
of instantaneous energy
transfer is not allowed
in the classical theory.
Therefore Planck's idea
of energy quanta can
never be explained
within the classical theory.
In 1905,
Einstein proposed
a hypothesis
that the light
(radiation) exists
in a form of grains
(or corpuscles
or particles) in a space.
This is the
Einstein's hypothesis
of light quanta.
|
|
[The Miraculous Year]
The year 1905
was a miraculous year
(annus mirabilis)
in the history of sciences.
In 1905, A. Einstein
published
three great papers,
each of which
may be worth being awarded
a Nobel Prize independently.
The first was
on the discovery
of light quanta,
which contains the theory
of the photoelectric effect
as discussed below.
The second was
on the theory
of Brownian motion,
which shows the real
existence of atoms
and molecules.
The third contained
the special theory
of relativity.
An office worker
of the Berne Patent Office
published three great works
just in one year,
the amazing year of 1905.
This was nothing
other than a "miracle".
|
[The Photoelectric Effect]
A metal surface
that is illuminated
by light
emits charged particles.
This phenomenon
was discovered by
H. R. Hertz
(Germany, 1857 - 94)
while he was doing
experiments concerning
the electromagnetic waves.
One of his students,
P. E. A. von Lenard
(Germany, 1862 - 1947)
measured the
charge-to-mass ratio
of these particles
and confirmed
that the particles
are electrons (1900).
Hence this phenomenon
is called
the photoelectric effect.
A schematic drawing
of the apparatus detecting
the photoelectric effect
is shown in
the following figure.
|
|
The apparatus detecting the photoelectric effect
Two plates (electrodes)
are put
in a vacuum glass tube.
When ultraviolet rays
are illuminated
on the one of the plates,
an electric current flows
if the illuminated plate
is electrically negative
as Case (A),
but no current
if it is positive
as Case (B).
|
[Einstein's Theory
on the Photoelectric Effect]
On the basis
of the hypothesis
of light quanta,
Einstein proposed
the following theory
about the
photoelectric effect
(1905).
This was contained
in the same paper
as the idea
of light quanta
was proposed.
Einstein thought
that the light
of a frequency
is existing
in a form of grains
(corpuscles or particles)
of the energy of
and absorbed as whole units
by electrons in a metal.
These whole units
are light quanta.
If the energy
gained by an electron
is greater than the energy
W necessary
to carry the electron
from inside to outside
of the metal,
then the electron
would be emitted
as a photoelectron.
Here
W
is called
the work function,
which has already
been known
by Richardson's research
on the thermal electrons.
(
Richardson:
See the following
figure (C).)
|
[Millikan's Experiment
on the Photoelectric Effect]
The above-mentioned
Einstein's theory
on the photoelectric effect
was proved by
Millikan's experiment
carried out in 1916.
The schematic drawing
of the apparatus
for Millikan's experiment
is shown in the above
figure (D).
The experimental results
are summarized
as follows:
(1)
If all the electrons
emitted by the photoelectric effect
are collected on the anode
by setting the voltage
V
rather high,
the electric current
flowing through the ammeter
would be proportional
to the intensity
of the light
illuminated on the cathode.
(2)
There is a threshold
frequency of the light
illuminated
on the cathode
for photoelectric emission.
If the frequency
of the light is
less than this threshold
value,
no photoelectrons
are released
no matter how intense
the illumination is.
(3)
The maximum kinetic energy
of the photoelectron
is independent of
the intensity of the light
illuminated.
(4)
The maximum kinetic energy
of the emitted electrons
is a linear function
of the frequency,
which is exactly
the same as Einstein's
hypothesis,
i.e.,
Millikan obtained
the constant h from
this experiment as
which is well fit
to the value obtained
by Planck's analysis
about the cavity radiation.
|
[Difficulty of the Classical Theory]
It is impossible
to explain
the above-mentioned
results of Millikan's experiment
within the classical theory
consisting of
Newtonian mechanics
and Maxwellian electromagnetism.
We can easily imagine
the followings
within the classical theory:
When a light is illuminated
on the surface of a metal,
electrons in the metal
are violently shaked
and oscillated
by the electromagnetic
field of the light.
If the oscillation
is too hard
to keep the electrons
inside the metal,
they jump out of
the metal surface.
According to the
classical theory,
the energy given
to the electrons
in this case
must be proportional
to the square of
the strength of
the electromagnetic field.
Hence the maximum energy
of the photoelectron
must be dependent
on the intensity
of the light illuminated.
This completely contradicts
Millikan's experimental results
summarized above,
in which
(2),
(3) and
(4)
can never be explained
with the classical theory.
Moreover, we cannot
explain the time
to produce the photoelectric effect
within the classical theory.
The emission of
the photoelectrons appears
practically instantaneous.
This cannot be explained
with the classical theory.
Let us discuss this below.
The value of
the work function
W
of standard metals is
Here let us discuss
the photoelectric effect
for a metal with
The energy of light
passing through an area
of
in 1 s (second)
at a distance
of 1 m from
a point source
of light at a rate
of 1 W (watt)
is
When we illuminate
this light on the metal,
the energy of the
light hit on an atom
is
since the cross section
of an atom is nearly
Suppose that the atom
would absorb all
this energy and
it would be given
to one electron in the atom,
and thereby a photoelectric
effect would occur.
More energy
than the value
of the work function
must then be
accumulated on the electron
before the emission.
It takes about 100 s for this.
This means that
the photoelectron
comes out about
100 s after switching
on the light source.
However the
photoelectric effect
occurs instantaneously
in practice.
Thus the classical
theory cannot explain
the photoelectric effect.
We could understand all
without any contradiction,
if we think
that light is
instantaneously absorbed
as a whole unit
of the energy
by the electron
in the metal.
This is Einstein's hypothesis
of energy quanta.
|
Top
|
|
Go back to
the top page of Part 3.
Go back to
the last page.
Go to
the next page.
|