![]()
Top of Part 4
![]()
Last page
![]()
Next page
|
4-2: The Atomic Spectra |
The lights from discharge tubes
or arcs across
various kinds of electrodes
with a high voltage potential
being applied
represent line spectra
which consist
of a numbers of bright sharp lines
characteristic of the gases
involved in the tube
or the matters of the electrodes.
Some examples are shown
in the pictures
below.
|
|
Examples of Atomic Spectra
The sun light has
a continuous spectrum,
in which there are
some absorption lines
named the Fraunhofer lines
of which detailed explanations
are omitted here.
The spectra of hydrogen
and mercury
show some characteristic lines,
but the pictures here
are not so good
to look them clearly.
|
[Balmer's Formula]
The group of lines
of the hydrogen spectrum
named the Balmer series
which are observed
in the part from visible to
ultraviolet region
is shown in
the following picture.
(Other series
than the Balmer one,
e.g. the Lymann, Paschen
and Brackett series,
are found in the hydrogen
spectrum as well.)
|
|
A line spectra of hydrogen atom
(the Balmer series)
|
A high school teacher,
J. J. Balmer
(Switzerland, 1825 - 98)
discovered in 1885 that
the wavelengths of the spectral lines,
,
,
and
,
in the Balmer series
shown
in the above picture
are respectively written
and these are represented
by a simple formula
This is called
Balmer's formula.
It has been confirmed
that the other lines
in the Balmer series
than the above
,
,
and
also obey Balmer's
formula mentioned above.
|
[Rydberg's Formula]
In 1890,
Rydberg (Sweden)
found a very simple formula
which
can represent
the wavelengths
,
not only in the
hydrogen spectrum
but also in the spectra
of alkali atoms.
This is
Rydberg's formula
where m
and n are integers,
and a and b
are different
for each series of spectra
but constant within a series.
The constant R
is called the
Rydberg constant
whose value was obtained
from the experimental data
for hydrogen as
Balmer's formula
is one of the special cases in
Rydberg's formula.
Putting
a = b = 0 and
m = 2
in Rydberg's formula,
we can obtain
which is equivalent
to Balmer's formula.
We cannot explain these
Balmer's and Rydberg's
formulae
with the classical theory.
At this point people
necessitated
making a big jump
to a new revolutionary theory.
|
Top
|
|
Go back to
the top page of Part 3.
Go back to
the last page.
Go to
the next page.
|